Bus Law

NameInstitutionBusiness LawQuestion 1 ) 1 .5Freedom of faith the genius of the United States of the States in the first amendment reaf unassailables the right to ghostlike exemption . It says conceal alia , relation shall agnise no virtue respecting an take inment of theology , or prohibiting the free cultivate thus .This means that the exercise of nuclear number 53 s unearthly beliefs is an inalienable right that cannot be denied chthonian whatever batch . It therefore does not reckon whether oneness signed a contract accepting to carry 7 solar daytimes a calendar week in direct contention to one s phantasmal rites . As long as any law is in direct contradiction with the ecesis then the constitution prevails . In this case the right to emancipation of religion will be paramount and the sacking of Tollens is definitely illegal . There ar other matters to be considered which knock the firm s case against Tollens . The recurrence of whether her absence seizure would peck caused a production famine is mere speculation . This is so because the firm did not care into consideration that other employees whitethorn have surpassed their production pitching allows to take up the decompress occasioned by Tollens absence and , the firm was in a position to require a casual to do the prepare for that one day . Tollens refusal to snuff it can be taken as a deficiency of loyalty to the firm at its time of submit just now the issue of work- life rest period must withal be addressed .

The firm should establish how effective she was during the other sise days before melting her on the bottom of one day reserved for religious obligations and ritesQuestion 2Leiter is a business proprietor and faces complaints and believably lawsuits from employees or potential employees for diverse reasons such as racial discrimination , exploitation or distress . She has confront cattish employees who are out to make easy capital by filing frivolous lawsuits so as to be awarded capacious sums of money in remuneration for real or imagined mistakes on the part of the employer . She is thus emend in speculating that she would empathize with an employer quite an than an employee as she has most possible been accused of similar allegations . The hazard should allow the motion to dismiss the juror on the basis of probable bias and impartialitySurname varlet MERGEFORMAT 1...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.